"I spent some time this morning looking at
PureEdit. It bills itself as a CMS, which I don’t know that I can agree with completely.
For the record, I only watched a couple of screencasts and browsed
through some of the code. I don’t know if it would call it a CMS based
on
the definition we offered a few months ago,
since there’s no higher CMS functionality: versioning, workflow,
check-in/out, granular user management, etc. (PureEdit is, actually,
every bit the “RDBWAAS” mentioned in the afore-linked article.)"
Complete Story
Advertisement:
You have already tagged this post. Your tags: